.
Feedback

Qualifying: Day No. 1

Local qualifying runs through Friday.

Let election season begin. Qualifying, , started Wednesday.

Here are some of the people who qualified and issued press releases:

, Republican candidate for Cherokee County Board of Education, chair

With the ink barely dry on the new district maps, Janet Read filed paperwork and fees and qualified to run for the newly created County-wide School Board Chairperson position on Wednesday, May 23.

Read was first elected to the Cherokee County School Board in 2004, and has served as a member and in leadership positions, twice as Chair and twice as Vice Chair, representing Post 4. In addition, Read has been a member of the PTA since 1998, serving as PTA president at Bascomb Elementary, and holding committee chair positions at Chapman Intermediate, ET Booth Middle and Etowah High Schools, where she currently serves as Membership Chair.

During her 8-year tenure with the Cherokee County School Board, the district has met Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) standards, as set by the Federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB); and the district has seen a significant rise in SAT scores.

In February, 2011, Read was named to Georgia's 53-member Education Advisory Board by Governor Nathan Deal.

One of Read's most notable qualities is her accessibility, and she is regularly invited to speak to citizen groups, business organizations and PTAs, and to attend events that include parents, teachers and students in Cherokee County. 

As a School Board Member, Read recognizes that her role is to represent the interests of the parents, students and teachers of Cherokee County, and she has been present at every School Board meeting since her election to the Board in 2004.

Her goal is to continue to ensure that the School Board focuses not on power, but on representing the citizens of the county as an advocate of education.

• • •

, Republican candidate for Cherokee County Board of Education, Post 1

Today, Kelly Marlow officially qualified for Cherokee County School Board, District 1.

"It is my honor and privilege as a Republican to qualify for the upcoming July 31st primary," declared Mrs. Marlow. "I plan to dedicate myself full-time to the board in an effort to unite our community around one focused goal, to ensure that every child in Cherokee County gets a top-notch public education."

Mrs. Marlow has invited the community to meet her at the BridgeMill Park on June 1st from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m.

In addition, Mrs. Marlow announced today that "to show how serious I am about putting students first, if elected, I plan to initiate an immediate 'Classroom Grant' program to be funded by my personal monthly Board of Education stipend."

Mrs. Marlow added, "It's time to challenge our board members to take steps to make education in the classroom their first priority."

For more information about Kelly Marlow and her campaign, please visit www.kellyforourschools.com.

• • •

, Republican candidate for Cherokee County Tax Commissioner

Cherokee County Tax Commissioner Sonya Little qualified today for tax commissioner. Commissioner Little is currently finishing the unexpired term of David Fields, the former tax commissioner who retired due to health reasons in early 2011. After taking the oath of office, Ms. Little hit the ground running redoubling her efforts to make the tax and tag office as user friendly as possible.

“Having worked for Commissioner Fields I knew the systems but when I had the opportunity to implement some of the changes, like Saturday hours, I moved as quickly as possible to add this service for the tax payers convenience,” Ms. Little said.

Upon qualifying, former Commissioner Fields immediately endorsed Ms. Little and her bid for office.

“Frankly, I knew I had left the office in good hands, but I have to say I am truly impressed to know her dedication matches, and perhaps surpasses, that which I held so dear during my tenure,” Fields said.

Since Ms. Little took office, the Cherokee County Tax office has been heralded as a “model” for other county offices around the state. 

Ms. Little resides in Canton with her husband Jeff. They have two grown children who also reside in Cherokee County. The Littles are members of McHelen Baptist Church.

• • •

, Republican candidate for State House District No. 21

Four months ago today, when I kicked off this campaign to seek the Republican nomination for State House District 21, it was with a servant’s heart and a goal of restoring faith in government. One of the greatest opportunities this campaign has offered me is the chance to listen to the concerns and issues that are important to the people of Cherokee County.

It is apparent that our community has become polarized over what is the best way to educate our children. It is unfortunate and unnecessary that those that support the concept of school choice and those that support traditional public education have been separated into groups and pitted against each other by our current leadership. When did these two concepts become mutually exclusive? We can do better than a community that has been polarized on this issue. To get beyond this nasty us vs. them mentality, we will need a choice in candidates and true representation.

Also, tax reform has long been piecemealed together with the best breaks going to those with the best lobbyists. We can do better than using the tax code as a carrot and a stick. We need to clean the slate, implement a fair tax and put everyone on a level playing field. If we want to see real tax reform and not various programs that are cobbled together to appease the lobbyists, then we will need a choice in candidates.

Finally, as voters head into the booth on July 31st, where they will be asked to tax themselves to fund the T-SPLOST to the tune of $8.5 billion, they would be penalized by having to provide a higher level of matching funds for local projects if they don’t agree to the tax. We can do better and therefore I have called for the repeal of this threatening legislation, because you should never be penalized for not agreeing to be taxed. We also need someone that will fight to maintain control of the funding of any projects, like new lanes on 575, and prevent the building of toll lanes financed by foreign countries. 

Further, I don’t believe any amendment to the T-SPLOST legislation will be acceptable until dissenting voters have a guaranteed ability to opt-out of the program as soon as a vote fails in each of their respective counties. I will fight to ensure that this option is made available to my fellow voters. I embarked on the mission of raising awareness about issues such as the need for ethics reform, and I have placed the utmost importance on hearing disparate, even competing sides of the issues I just mentioned. My experiences in meeting and hearing from a wide range of voters in my County and District have reaffirmed my conviction that we can do better. We can do better.

And so, by qualifying formally for this nomination today, I offer myself up as a better choice to the voters of the new 21st district.

Rebecca May 27, 2012 at 08:38 pm
Even my 17 year old begged from her early years to go to a different school or be home schooled. I could not home school due to work and could not change her school due to district
Rebecca May 27, 2012 at 08:48 pm
...rules. So she struggled, not only with curriculum, style of teaching but with people being allowed to bully, be mean, ridicule etc even after me being in the school multiple times. There needs to changes in how we compensate out teachers to encourage better performance. I'm sorry but several I've encountered, had poor performance. I was ignored, my son was mistreated by staff, my daughter read told just to study harder. No t really impressed with Cherokee County yet. But what I will tell you is that bad mouthing people just because their is disagreement in how a parent wants to educate their kids, bad nothing people who stand up and try to be a proactive change...well it upsets me. I'm a long time resident of Georgia. My children were and are being educated here. So far, our best experience with a concerned teacher, staff and yes, even kids, are in or new school. My soon needed an eval for an IEP, we fought since 1st grade. They ignored requests. One year here and I've got my eval. Speaks volumes to me.
Rebecca May 27, 2012 at 09:08 pm
...rules. So she struggled, not only with curriculum, style of teaching but with people being allowed to bully, be mean, ridicule etc even after me being in the school multiple times. There needs to changes in how we compensate our teachers to encourage better performance. I'm sorry but several I've encountered, had poor performance. Educational concerns ignored, my son was mistreated by staff, my daughter was told just to study harder. Not really impressed with Cherokee County yet. But what I will tell you is that bad mouthing people just because there is disagreement in how a parent wants to educate their kids, bad nothing people who stand up and try to be a proactive change...well it upsets me. I'm a long time resident of Georgia. My children were and are being educated here. So far, our best experience with a concerned teacher, staff and yes, even kids, are in our new school. My son needed an eval for an IEP, we fought since 1st grade. They ignored requests. Written requests. On threat of an attorney, they stated they'd start evaluations. Too late. One year here and I've got my eval. Speaks volumes to me.
Rebecca May 27, 2012 at 09:11 pm
Oh and by the way, the fb page is for parents of CCA students only. It's not an open group. There are no CCA admin, teachers or other hired personnel allowed. Ticks me off when people attack without full knowledge.
Rebecca May 27, 2012 at 09:19 pm
And while we are at it, the few programs opening up in CCSD is a good start but cannot accommodate all, children who would want or need to go (from what I've learned) so therefore I feel talking about how the charters are selective has no weight. I'm personally glad there are rules for that.Add is, class size for my third grader was 23. I'd like it smaller, as we all would, no master what school or kids are in...a little fresh blood in the BOE would be welcome in my opinion. Thank goodness she is for exceptional education for all our children, not just one school. I have one in Woodstock district and I damn sure care about her education as much as my 9 year old.
Mikael R Kient May 27, 2012 at 10:58 pm
Ashley--- the number one polarizer right here.. Still arguing the unfounded rhetoric.
Rebecca May 27, 2012 at 11:03 pm
I hate we have been put in this position. I agree that bureaucrats are responsible. I think there is a desire within our community for this. It's evident to me and to parents who walked away from the school system, not knowing if we'd survive., There is a desire to find a place where our children will not only do well, but thrive and excel. I will do some homework before I chat regarding how there's no oversight and the "for profit" end. This company has charters all over the country. Not sure you've investigated them, and there is a local governing board made up of community leaders etc (double checking as we speak) so we do have local control.
Rebecca May 27, 2012 at 11:08 pm
As well, I'm a parent first and it is my concern that we have ability to send out children to schools that best serve them. And I'm not sure there's not mismanagement within the school systems etc that also contribute to finding issues do I'm not sure I want them controlling my charter. Plus I'm here for the different approach to teaching. If I wanted the same style of teaching (because I believe it would be if controlled by the school system), then I'd have left my son where he was.
Rebecca May 27, 2012 at 11:09 pm
funding issues...apologies.
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:26 am
Do charter schools take money from public schools? Because charter schools are public schools, they receive public funding. With Georgia’s Quality Basic Education (QBE) formula, charter schools between 30 and 90 percent of the per-student funding that other public schools receive. They remove 100 percent of the cost of educating any particular student from the system, but only get 30-90 percent of the money a district would spend to educate that student. Charter schools draw on district funds, but they also leave school districts with fewer students to educate, and often bring in students who would not otherwise be on the district’s or state’s funding lists, such as dropouts, students who previously attended private schools or were homeschooled, and students from outside the district who choose to attend particular charter schools. The fundamental question is whether the dollars belong to children or to the system. In an educational environment where student achievement and constituent satisfaction are the ultimate goals, the money should "follow children to the schools their families select. Public dollars are meant to be spent for the education of a particularstudent. They are not entitlements for school systems" (Charter Schools in Action p. 152).
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:31 am
I posted that to you so you'd see I'm liking up things here and...I want you to look at it. Charters get 30 to 90 percent of what traditional public schools get per child. Since this is the money we get, some I'd left in the education pot for a child no logger even there in traditional school. If the child if no longer there, one less child to figure out how to educate on an already over taxed system?
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:32 am
..some is left in the educational pot for a child no longer there...sry
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:34 am
Ok...not in school...but that shouldn't master...if child isn't there, you aren't technically losing money...you are over crowded to begin with
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:41 am
So do you see the monies as the children's or the schools...as to Chip Rogers...I'm doing my time trying to figure out all the BS in the govt...what I do know is if you remove 1162 , you take away my right to choice because the system will not allow anything not controlled by them and they are single handedly trying to shut charters down. We have NO chance the System will Ashlee it. That's why the charters and local families etc need it. It I'd write unfair. The credentials were there. This seemed more like a witch hunt to me.
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:42 am
...will allow it
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:46 am
So maybe the boe and local controlling parties need to be a but more open and willing to bring more educational choice to our kids that is truly inclusive and educationally productive. I'm disatisfied with or choice and I'm not about to willingly hand them control when, at least for my child, they will cause more undue damage.
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:50 am
I do agree cutting funding is disastrous in any school. I also know this isn't solely being done in the schools. Funding is being cut in other necessary services and we, sa community and state have suffered. Families lost their homes. The cuts aren't necessarily because anyone is ticking powers that be off and if charter schools can pull a few kids out and help you educate them, why fight?
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:56 am
And regarding the charter school all this is focusing around...it had to be put together fast because of last minute approval. It will have growing pains and a stumble due to people applying negativity to it. Wish people would not fear us or hate it. E will always be about community service and teaching our youth the greater lessons of life...
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 12:57 am
Thank you for the conversation as well. :-)
Holly J May 28, 2012 at 01:21 am
"They remove 100 percent of the cost of educating any particular student from the system," This the same argument I hear over and over again, but it ignores reality. If 1 child leaves a TPS for private, charter, or homeschool, 100% of the cost IS NOT removed. The same number of teachers will be employed, the same buildings will require maintenance. At best, ONE class has ONE less student, And, depending on how the charter is set up, upwards of 45% of the money used to keep that same number of teachers and same buildings maintained is gone (the state per pupil funding portion). The only way this scenario works is if 25-30 kids from ONE grade level in ONE school go. Then, you remove the cost of a teaching position. That's it. As it stands now, it is removing kids one and two at a time spread out over multiple schools. No savings there.
The last quote there completely misstates why we fund public schools with tax dollars. It is NOT "for the education of a particular student." Look at your tax bill. The part of your property taxes that go to schools comes no where close to covering even ONE of your kids,and if you have more than one child in the system, you don't pay more in taxes, so who's funding that "particular student"? We fund public schools with tax dollars because WE ALL benefit from an educated populace. Even if you don't have kids, you benefit. Once your kids are grown and out of school, you still benefit.
chonga May 28, 2012 at 02:30 am
I did have full knowledge- I was a parent to TWO children at CCA. Thank Heavens it was only for briefly. But I had to wait quite a bit to be placed their FB page. It was to that that I was referring.
Terry Tucker May 28, 2012 at 02:53 am
Thanks for the clarification. I pretty much agree with what you wrote.
Your last sentence sums up why there can't be competition between charter schools and traditional schools. Traditional schools are restricted by federal / state mandates. It would be like a football game and only one team is allowed to throw the ball. Same game but different rules.
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 05:02 am
Please don't twist my words. I did not say they removed the cost, I said they remove the monies allotted. However 10-70 percent (depending on how decided), does not go to the charter. So where does it go? However, if you remove 25 kids from one school, that's still one classroom size less. How you spread your teachers would of course be a question, I'm sure. But another problem is, historically, turnout is light for school board elections so over turning a current school board may indeed be very difficult. As we have seen, ineffective, even corrupt boards have stayed in place for years. Of course, we could all say get out and vote but let's be realistic. Doesn't happen like we would want. The fact that the BOE/local governing authorities have systematically shut down or denied charters tells me we won't see unbiased movement at the local level. And yes it costs to educate, not all costs will be abated. But there will be less using system resources (food, computers, books and others). Classrooms might be a little smaller, encouraging a better individual outcome for our children. It's not all about money. It's about finding the right environment that supports our kids, their future and, ours because of them. Its not a fair request to ask a parent to wait it out till elections
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 05:13 am
...and what should be fine in the meantime...watch a child be drug under the bus? It, once again, is not acceptable, when the ability to use other, perhaps more appropriate options is present. And I would tell the state and local governments to fund our systems (charters, private, traditional public, virtual/online) appropriately so the teachers and parents can get back to business of raising and properly educating and preparing our children to compete in this global economy.
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 05:42 am
Thank you for the debate. I think we all have valid concerns. That tells me people should validate others concerns, then work together, instead of tearing each other down, and in turn our hope for our children's hope. I read somewhere that someone devaluated parental and community involvement in educating our children. I feel teaching is not just your job but mine as well. And when parents teach their children, get the hands dirty within their child's school, become thought of as a truly equal partner in their child's education, it will be a blessing. Some parents are far too lax and some teachers have trouble letting parents truly be involved. Thankfully, I'm seeing a difference in how I, as the parent, am treated and included on decision making o (to degree I can be without disruption, of course).
Rebecca May 28, 2012 at 05:45 am
Children's future...its very late. Good night. :-)
Holly J May 28, 2012 at 12:31 pm
No one is twisting your words. I cut and copied your quote from your 8:26 pm above and that is what Ashley is referring to : "They remove 100 percent of the cost of educating any particular student from the system"
Holly J May 28, 2012 at 01:22 pm
" If I wanted the same style of teaching (because I believe it would be if controlled by the school system)" : So, you don't want the local BOE to have any say in the charter, but you want the local money? I'd ask you to look at the charters for Walton HS and Sedalia Park Elementary in Cobb County. These are conversion charters, which means they are TRULY still public schools- they have to take whoever lives in their district with whatever special needs (gifted, SPED, ELL) may come with them. So, they are still "controlled by the system", BUT, in their charter they are allowed to take their textbook allotment and buy whatever books will best fit how they teach the state curriculum to their particular student population. They also have more flexibility in how they arrange their instructional time. The get to use their staff development funds for training that best addresses their teachers' needs. (ALL of which EVERY school should be allowed to do, if we are serious about helping kids learn). Sounds like they are adapting to the needs of their students, which is what I hear charter folks are all about, without needing a 3rd party management company involved. That is a charter school I would happily support here, yet I hear NOTHING about conversion charters.
Addie Price May 28, 2012 at 05:34 pm
I would love for you to take a look at my blogs on education. I welcome your feedback and thoughts. The education of our children is not only their future but ours also. It is very important and shouldn't be taken lightly. http://addieprice.hubpages.com/
Frank Jones May 30, 2012 at 04:36 pm
@Ashley...very good point re: Addie's school funding graph. If you use the BLS inflation calculator, Addie's $43,000 cost of an education in 1970 would be $255,000 in 2012; however, her chart claims the 2010 cost was only $149,000. Assuming that Addie's numbers are accurate: 1) our "bloated"/inefficient education system is saving $111,000 per educated child or 2) our schools are having to skimp on our children's education due to a cut of $111,000 per child.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Canton-Sixes Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something