.

Stacy Bailey Appeals Termination, Documents Altered?

The lawyer of the former Canton Police Department sergeant alleges documents were altered against his client and that she was never subject to a policy she was accused of violating.

The woman at the center of the "golf cart controversy" is appealing her recent termination by the Canton Police Department.

The attorney for former Sgt. Stacy Bailey claims that extrinsic evidence and altered documents show that his client was not guilty of violating a financial policy she was allegedly never subject to in the first place.

Bailey was terminated from her position in November for violating the City of Canton Financial Policy and allegedly concealing her affair with Sandy Springs Police Cpt. Scott Jamison in order to purchase a golf cart for Jamison's disabled son using Explorers program money.

Bailey has appealed her termination on Dec. 17 by filing a notice to that effect with the City of Canton. In the notice, Bailey included the documents she says prove she never changed the security on the Explorers bank account and that she was never party to the City of Canton's Financial Policy. The documents have been attached to this article.

Altered Documents?

Bailey's appeal of her termination includes copies of original Cherokee Bank documents from 2006, when Bailey opened the account for the Explorers program she was to head for the department.

The first document of Oct. 3, 2006 lists Bailey and former Chief Jeff Lance as authorized signatories on checks written for the account. Additionally, the document states 14 times that the number of signatories required for a check was one.

Later on Oct. 3, a man named Scott Hoffman was added to the signatory list, and the original number of required signatories was removed with white out. The original number of one was replaced with two, meaning that two of the authorized signatories had to sign off on a check for it to be valid.

Despite this change, Bailey's attorney Lance LoRusso cites extrinsic evidence-evidence that no party in the case could possibly have control over-to show that if this extra signature was required, it was never enforced. According to LoRusso, checks that were cleared by Cherokee Bank for six years between 2006-12 show that only one signature was needed to make purchases using the Explorers account.

Additionally, LoRusso says that during the internal investigation conducted by the Marietta Police Department, the officers in charge of the investigation failed to investigate anyone from the bank about this apparent discrepancy. The report of the Marietta investigation shows no interviews with any bank personnel.

The Marietta investigation also concludes that Bailey changed the number of required signatories from two to one earlier this year. LoRusso contends that the documents from January, 2012 were an updated signatories list and that the one required signature was unchanged from the original 2006 documentation. 

Was Bailey Subject to the City of Canton Financial Policy?

One of the primary reasons listed for Bailey's termination by both the Marietta investigation and Chief Robert Merchant in his letter of termination was Bailey's violation of the City of Canton Financial Policy.

According to LoRusso, the money from the Explorers program budget was never under the jurisdiction of the City of Canton because it was money donated to the program from members of the public.

"The Canton Financial Policy applies to city funds that are budgeted and are audited on a regular basis," LoRusso said. "Explorer money was never audited or budgeted because it was always private funds."

It seems that acquiring a copy of this policy is also somehwat difficult; LoRusso alleges that neither the Police Department nor City Hall had a copy available to Bailey when she requested one during the investigation. Bailey claims that the first time she saw a copy of the policy was during the internal investigation by the Marietta Police Department. 

LoRusso says that when Bailey first went to the city's finance department for a tax ID for the Explorers bank account, the department gave her a number and said they would ensure the account was set up for a non-profit entity.

Documents from the Marietta investigation show that the number Bailey was given was shared by the City of Canton as its tax ID. LoRusso said that Bailey thought her ID number was unique.

Furthermore, LoRusso questions the diligence of the finance department in its handling of the account.

"Why wasn't Canton auditing this account for six years?," LoRusso said.

The Marietta investigation chastised the finance department for its handling of the Explorers bank account.

Missing Receipts

In Merchant's letter to Bailey notifying her of her termination, Merchant writes that during the period between May 30, 2011 and June 30, 2012, the Explorers program received $31,830.74 and spent $31,943.79. Merchant says the lack of checks and balances on Bailey's handling of the account was, "inexcusable and indefensible."

LoRusso says that Bailey handed over all receipts of the Explorers program when asked to by Merchant, and that only $113.05 of expenses are unaccounted for. According to LoRusso's math, that is an error rate of .004 percent.

LoRusso says that Canton Police authorities and the Explorers program board were on board with Bailey's proposal to honor one special child after abandoning the "Shop With A Cop" program. LoRusso claims that the support of the head of the Explorers board to change the program was attained before Bailey met Scott Jamison in May, 2011.

The Marietta investigation says that Bailey neglected to inform her superiors or the board that the child she wished to honor was the son of the man she was having an affair with, and had they known that to be the case they would have vetoed the purchase.

LoRusso says the Marietta investigation was poorly handled and improperly carried out. Not once in the document is there any mention of interviewing Cherokee Bank personnel or anyone on the Explorers board.

"They didn't look at the evidence properly," LoRusso said.

Gayla December 18, 2012 at 09:19 PM
This could get interesting....hmmmm
Patricia Saye December 18, 2012 at 10:46 PM
Yes, Gayla you are exactly right, and I will have to agree with you about this 100%
Patricia Saye December 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM
I think Robert Merchant will get the biggest shock of his life before this case is closed
Patricia Saye December 18, 2012 at 11:28 PM
Robert Merchant the Chief of Police is going to see just how nasty a situation can really get before coming to a close
Aurora S Thomas December 19, 2012 at 02:35 PM
I am on the Explorer board and I have to say I totally disagree with MPD quote "The Marietta investigation says that Bailey neglected to inform her superiors or the board that the child she wished to honor was the son of the man she was having an affair with, and had they known that to be the case they would have vetoed the purchase." The bottom line is the Board & explorers all voted to dis ban shop with a cop due to families coming out of the wood work who really didn't need help. Instead we all voted to help a child in need. Regardless who the child was or the fact that Bailey was seeing the child we helped dad, we still would have helped this child, as this was & still is a child who clearly needs help. Her personal & private life should have NEVER been brought out into the media & public like it has, with that, if you are going to expose her personal & private life, i would like to see every officer, mayor, chief, city council's personal & private life exposed for all to see. We all have those skeleton's in our closet, the ONLY perfect person I know of is God. We never asked if the child we wanted to help knew Bailey of if Bailey was seeing his Dad, as that was NOT important, what was & is important is helping a child in need, which Marietta PD you lost focus on what is important here. You all NEVER called any of us or asked us anything. GBI did their work, they called us & asked us! Why didn't MPD????? Fishy!
Tonya Marie Simmons December 19, 2012 at 05:54 PM
Stacy has done nothing to deserve this chastising. She has every right to prove her case and spend as much time doing so. She cared about the Explores program, our community as well as this city. If you want to talk about her personal life mention that she is a wonderful mother, friend to all and hard worker that gave our city her best everyday! Sure she found love, whatever! I don't care who it is with, how they met or when. Matters of the heart are unexplainable and completely private in my opinion. Choose to ask the city why they have a problem with this case staying open until the truth comes out. Tell me why annual audits did not take place for ALL of the money circulating in our city? Are we not all at liberty to prove our innocence? Stacy, fight for the truth because you are the only one that can at this point. I am ashamed and disgusted over this whole accusation. This city lost someone that would have protected us to the best of her abilities. Unfortunately we may never know the truth because the root of this problem is much deeper than just a golf cart. I smell foul play in this case as well as hidden agendas. Merry Christmas Canton! We lost one of the "good guys" and I'm sure it won't be the last time it happens. Bill of Rights anyone?
Kim Subacz December 19, 2012 at 08:58 PM
I don't know many details, but I have seen Bailey in the news a lot. On first glance this really looks like an "old boys club" at its finest.
Scott December 27, 2012 at 08:23 PM
I thought Police Officers were held to a higher standard? I think sometimes that gets them in trouble.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something