School Board in Limbo for Qualfying
Pre-clearance on the county's new maps may not be completed by next week's qualifying.
Some members of the Cherokee County Board of Education are still in limbo as to which district map they’ll be qualifying under next week. And, there’s a chance they still may not know when qualifying begins on Wednesday.
House Bill 978, which changes the way school board members are elected and draws two members out of their districts, was sent to the Department of Justice for pre-clearance on April 5. The process typically takes 60 days, though school board attorney Tom Roach said he requested an expedited review, which is expected to be completed by June 5.
“It’s the worst situation to be in,” Roach said.
Should the new district maps not be approved by the end of business next Tuesday, Roach said the county’s election superintendent would be responsible to decide the next step. That could include requalifying once the new maps are approved, having a judge rule should a lawsuit be filed or allowing the board members to maintain their current posts until the next election.
“What happens after that is anybody’s guess,” Roach said.
Roach said the Department of Justice has around 2,700 new maps to approve and that some legislative delegations came up with backup plans should their new maps not be approved by the time qualifying begins.
“I wonder if there was some kind of expectation that it would be pre-cleared in time,” Roach said.
Before Thursday night’s regular meeting, Superintendent Frank Petruzielo met with board members to discuss preparations for the 2012-2013 budget. Petruzielo said that even with maintaining all of this year’s major cuts and increasing furlough days to eight, the school system will still have to dip into its fund balance, dropping its reserves from $32 million to $27 million. And, the school system would fall short of new guidelines requiring school systems to keep 12-15 percent of its budget in its reserves. To hit the 12 percent mark, the school system would need an additional $10 million in its fund balance.
“I think the plan has been we were going to try to put $1 million a year in there,” Petruzielo said. “We’re going to try to do the best we can.”
Factors negatively impacting the proposed budget include the discontinuation of $21 million American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds and $7.4 million in job stimulus money, which funded 132 positions this year. And, the school system’s portion of funding for state health insurance is increasing. Over the last five years, the school system has seen its portion increase by $10.3 million even though it’s operating with 522 fewer employees.
The local tax digest also is continuing to “hemorrhage”, Petruzielo said. In the last five years, it’s dropped from $7.8 million to a projected $5.8 million for the 2012-2013 school year, which is the same level it was in 2004.
In addition, because of the creation of opportunity zones and other economic development stimulators, the school system now won’t receive the $3 million it was project to get from a new outlet mall slated for Woodstock.
“For years, heard from Chamber how important it would be to get more commercial property on tax rolls,” Petruzielo said. “This is the opposite of that. This is taking commercial property off the tax rolls.”
Petruzielo said that he’s not sure what will happen for the 2013-2014 school year but that he doesn’t anticipate any significant funding at the local level.
“I think it is very unlikely that we are going to get any help at the federal level,” the superintendent said. “The only light at the end of the tunnel for this school system based on the fiscal challenges that we face lie with the governor and the state legislature. If they believe that public education should survive, then their policies will reflect that. If they don’t, 2012-2013 will be a warm up for what happens in 2013-2014.”
Don’t miss any of the local news you care about. Subscribe to Canton-Sixes Patch’s free newsletter, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
KELLI
7:53 am on Friday, May 18, 2012
Since we have seen that AUSTERITY dosn't work, which means the continual cutting and gutting of education and vital segments of society that are so important to growth; why continue to do it? Raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations in Georgia until the Depression is over... Recession leads to the Depression we are not in - because government needs to spend in order to get OUT of the Recession. If you go the opposite way (which is more Austerity) you end up with Depression... which you are now having and will have until you correct it...
KELLI
7:57 am on Friday, May 18, 2012
...Redistricting happened a while ago, why has your area not been better prepared for it's changes?
Chris Knowles
1:41 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
It is a little difficult for me to understand how the District does their math. In order to education myself, I decided totry using some published facts ...
Based on my analysis of actual salary spend data between 2008 and 2011 from open.georgia.gov (excluding any spend data where former employees may have been hired as contractors) I found some interesting information:
1. Overall number of jobs are well over 500 less than 2008 (roughly 5 years ago)
2. However, the total salary spend in 2011 was only $2.9M less than it was in 2008
3. Using the "district published" number of 522 jobs (my count is actually 604) the aggregate cut in spending from job cuts amounts to about $550.00 per head.
4. The significant majority of teacher/administrator and district positions continued to show growth across the 4 year period of 2008 - 2011
So while the initial number of "lost jobs" sounds impressive, reality sends a completely different message.
Here is a simple summary of my findings:
Year FTE Self-reported Spend
============================================
2008 6438 $219,687,955.09
2009 6356 $230,781,255.89
2010 6096 $220,989,528.80
2011 5834 $216,779,275.76
If you would like the detailed report along with the supporting data in .pdf format, please send an e-mail to info@educationchoice.us.
Chris Knowles
1:45 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
should have read "in order to educate myself" ... apologies for the typo.
KELLI
12:42 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012
The spending is going down....
However - the four numbers to the left of the $ amounts is what? Does it represent the number of 'people'? If so, than the number of people is going down but the $ spent on them is more... (know what I mean?)
Or, am I reading this data all wrong?
Flock of Schoolgirls
12:42 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
Here's some easy math for you.
5th grade CRCT scores are now posted. Cherokee Charter Academy scored 13 points LOWER than the Cherokee County school district average. 26% of the CCA 5th graders FAILED the CRCT.
Honestly my hearts go out to these students and their families. They went to CCA believing they were getting a better education for their children and now those students will have to spend time retaking the test and hoping they pass or they face retention. They could end up back at CCSD schools after parents pull them and be a year behind the peers they left just one year ago. I honestly feel terrible for them.
Christine
7:57 am on Monday, May 21, 2012
My first graders left CCA mid year and had a good bit of catching up to do with their peers when they returned to their home school. I shudder when thinking how much worse it would have been had we stayed the entire school year.
Mikael R Kient
6:44 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012
Where is the link to this numbers you have for CCA CRCT scores? OR is this just another one of your wishful thinking post?
Flock of Schoolgirls
12:49 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
CCA was actually the lowest performing 5th grade in the entire county.
Cheryl
9:58 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
@Flock...I think those scores are only the 5th grade writing test, not the CRCTs.
However it is still not looking good for those kids and parents who hoped they would get a great education at CCA, because this one element of their learning shows failure. Of course, this test isn't relevant to their charter because they only listed CRCT results in the charter.
Chris Knowles
10:08 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
Cheryl, my kids HAVE gotten a better education at CCA than they were getting at Horrible Holly Springs Elementary ... you don't know what you are talking about.
Schoolgirl, I'll tell you once but not again ... I don't engage with anonymous cowards who spout facts without sources and spin tales without merit because you are too much of a coward to put a face to your lies.
Frank Jones
10:24 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
@knowles...I'm not sure of the point you're attempting to make with the salary analysis. However, if you're implying that administrators are consuming the salaries, ki believe you're way off base.
Teachers are paid based upon their years of service, degree and certifications. While there are fewer teachers, the existing teachers have greater years of service, many are obtaining additional degrees and certifications, as such, the per teacher compensation is increasing.
Your simple analysis failed to address the real reason for the apparent $550 per lost teacher.
KELLI
1:08 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012
I'm not from the 'show-me' state but I'd like to be shown anyway... just what these teachers qualifications are - I don't trust someone telling me they are deserving of their consistantly higher salaries... I want proof and I feel the Georgia Board of Education, etc. needs to add that link to their website - for 'the peoples' review.... Or don't they believe in 'open' government...?
Cheryl
10:25 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
@Chris....notice that I said this one area of their education is a failure. I am sure there are great things going on at CCA, but this one set of test scores is not favorable. Traditional public schools are graded and compared using this score...why should charter school be any different?
Frank Jones
10:29 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
Where are the crct scores posted?
Cheryl
10:45 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
These are NOT the CRCT results but the mandated writing test given in grades 3, 5 & 8. Results for the 5th grade can be found at www.doe.k12.ga.us under the curriculum and assessment heading. CCSD schools are together and the charter scores are listed at the end with other charter schools on the 2012 School Aggregated Test Results.
Flock of Schoolgirls
2:43 am on Sunday, May 20, 2012
@chris knowles
I don't believe I asked you to engage me.
Flock of Schoolgirls
2:46 am on Sunday, May 20, 2012
@kelli
Just ask a teacher and/or administrators. I believe under the" highly qualified" rule of NCLB hey are required to show you. I've asked,several times, and I've never had a problem getting this info.
Flock of Schoolgirls
2:48 am on Sunday, May 20, 2012
@Cheryl thanks for the correcting me!
Mikael R Kient
6:56 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012
Still no link to the CRCT scores, so you are not factually correct in your claims as usual.
Listening
7:10 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012
They aren't talking about CRCT. Here's the link to the writing assessment they are talking about: http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/Assessment/Pages/WA-Grade-5-Statewide-Scores.aspx. You'll need to click on 2012 System Aggregated Data to see what they are talking about.
No More Bullies
10:38 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012
Wow, they didn't meet the state average.... That's not good.
chonga
11:33 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012
@Flock
I do believe you struck a nerve! I feel really badly for these kids too, as I have several friends with children still at CCA. Luckily, none of them in the 5th grade. I'm interested in seeing the rest of the scores. The head of the PTC said back in November '11 that CCA's scores were going to be outstanding.
chonga
11:42 pm on Monday, May 21, 2012
Our children were at CCA, but we removed them after attending for a brief time. We discovered upon returning to their old school just how much they were not taught at CCA, especially for my 4th grader.
Going through some papers recently, I found their "work" from CCA: if you love worksheets, then CCA is your school. I know some people really love it, and were really excited about it opening, myself included. But out of approximately 2,100+ applicants, why are only 826 students currently enrolled (per March 2012 school meeting report)? Did they manage to go through every single child on the waiting list, and they still cannot fill it to capacity (i.e. 995)?
Mikael R Kient
8:56 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Well a new anonymous " I used to go to CCA" how interesting... but who can knows since you dont identify who you really are... your opinions are suspect of being nothing more than status quo troll, maybe your Christine?....
An that one article suggest nothing about he school as a whole... lame to even think it does.
Frank Jones
12:00 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
@Mikael...Where is your dignity and respect? Calling people "trolls" and other terms is extremely boorish. I just wonder how your parents, co-workers, minister, and children would react if they knew. Your actions aren't that of a parent, a role model, or a mature adult.